[Alpine-info] Re-alpine 2.02 released
dag at wieers.com
Tue Oct 5 08:21:23 PDT 2010
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> :2010-10-05T17:04:Dag Wieers:
>> I am wondering what you want distribution packagers to do. Should we replace
>> alpine (like we did with pine when alpine was out), or do you expect people to
>> install both alpine and realpine next to each other.
>> (Same for pine/alpine binary symlinks for usability)
> The binary names are the same so there is no change.
Personally I would prefer (for the time being) to update the alpine
package and provide a virtual provides 'realpine', until things become
>> Also, I prefer using 'realpine' as the package name, instead of re-alpine.
>> What do other packagers think/do ? A guide for packagers would be useful for
>> consistency cross-distribution.
> If you wish to feel free. I've put in a rename request to sf a year ago
> to rename the project to realpine but still nothing happened.
>> I am not using those.
> Ok I'll remove that then as well. Thanks.
> Regards and thanks for the input
I was not representing all distribution packagers though ;-)
Another question, we include various functionality from Eduardo Chappa.
Are those expected to support realpine as well (now and in the future) ?
As without those, we'd be reducing functionality extensively :-/
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
More information about the Alpine-info