Hackneyed stereotyped conventional ignorance about amputation

[Joe Alessi]

Thats because my perspective, being a Nuclear Engineer, is on an atomic 
level. I break all things down to the sub particle. The lowest common 
denominator. I see a seperation between your motivation and your response to 
your motivation. You simply see your cause and effect as one.

  I don't doubt that emotion can be a driving force. Wars have been fought 
over less. I'm trying to point out that the response is your choice. You get 
to decide how you want to respond and what manner.

He slapped me...so I shot him.
He slapped me so I slapped him back.
He slapped me so I turned the other cheek.

You see the, "He slapped me" as license to respond in any manner however 
some responses are inappropriate. To the best of my knowledge, the cure for 
obsessive comulsion is a "Prozac" type mao inhibitor followed with years of 
intensive therapy. Some on the other hand will disagree and say a Shotgun is 
a far better cure. One of these responses in poor judgement and 
inappropriate. I'll let you pick.

Joe Alessi


>From: George Boyer <feenix2 at bellsouth.net>
>Reply-To: amp-l at u.washington.edu
>To: "Amputee Information Network" <amp-l at u.washington.edu>
>Subject: Re: Hackneyed stereotyped conventional ignorance about amputation
>Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 13:15:34 -0500
>
>Joe - what you're not seeing is that the concept of rational-irrational is
>irrelevant in the context at hand.  GB.
>
>Joe Alessi wrote:
>
> > George,
> >    Once again y
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com