Hackneyed stereotyped conventional ignorance aboutamputation

[margaret lauterbach]

At 03:01 PM 2/3/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear Margaret - if you read the list more frequently you would see that I'm
>not bringing up this matter....I'm responding.  However, shame is the least
>of things I had to deal with in the aftermath of what had been for me a huge
>ordeal.  Shame for a psychological derangement??  What a peculiar idea.
>You've offered some things which I wouldn't be proud of.  GB.
>
I know you are responding. I read the newspaper interview. I have tried to
set my mail program to filter out mail from you and Dave Fales, and it
doesn't seem to be responding. I'm god damned tired of this thread and the
bickering about semantics.  Margaret Lauterbach