[Dhsvm-users] Re: Dhsvm-users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 5

Thomas Adams Thomas.Adams at noaa.gov
Mon Feb 27 12:23:32 PST 2006


Jonathan,

I'm very interested in your ideas to get the DHSVM analyses done in GRASS GIS rather than ArcGIS and would like to help in your efforts. We have and use both, but our operational systems are Linux, plus I do a lot of research on Mac OS X. As you are no doubt aware, GRASS is far more advanced now from where it was 5 years ago.

Regards,
Tom



dhsvm-users-request at mailman1.u.washington.edu wrote:
> Send Dhsvm-users mailing list submissions to
> 	dhsvm-users at u.washington.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/dhsvm-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	dhsvm-users-request at mailman1.u.washington.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	dhsvm-users-owner at mailman1.u.washington.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Dhsvm-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. RE: Preprocessing continued... (Bowling, Laura C)
>    2. RE: Preprocessing continued... (Jonathan Greenberg)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:07:35 -0500
> From: "Bowling, Laura C" <bowling at purdue.edu>
> Subject: RE: [Dhsvm-users] Preprocessing continued...
> To: "User Support list for DHSVM Model" <dhsvm-users at u.washington.edu>
> Message-ID:
> 	<8D55AE2E11484D4DA3D2C0D525D8372202311906 at EXCH01.purdue.lcl>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
>
> With respect to the GRASS question, not that I have ever heard of, we
> gave up on GRASS in the UW lab about 10 years ago now, but maybe your
> email will motivate some closet GRASS users.  I'm still hoping for
> everything to be converted to python so that it will run in ArcGIS.
>
> I don't know of any rigorous model intercomparisons, although individual
> pieces of the model have been compared.  Generally, I believe people
> choose DHSVM because it has some functionality that they can't get from
> an alternative model.  So for some applications an alternative model may
> do better (and be easier to apply), but for some other questions,
> another model just isn't appropriate.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhsvm-users-bounces at mailman1.u.washington.edu
> [mailto:dhsvm-users-bounces at mailman1.u.washington.edu] On Behalf Of
> Jonathan Greenberg
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 5:51 PM
> To: User Support list for DHSVM Model
> Subject: [Dhsvm-users] Preprocessing continued...
>
> So the createstreamnetwork2 worked for the tutorial dataset (thanks!)
> but
> has there been any thought to trying to get some code written for
> something
> like GRASS GIS to make DHSVM completely open-source?
>
> On a somewhat unrelated note, has there been any comparison of this
> algorithm vs. other open source hydro models?  How does it stack up?
>
> --j
>
>   


-- 
Thomas E Adams
National Weather Service
Ohio River Forecast Center
1901 South State Route 134
Wilmington, OH 45177

EMAIL:	thomas.adams at noaa.gov

VOICE:	937-383-0528
FAX:	937-383-0033



More information about the Dhsvm-users mailing list