[Dhsvm-users] Humidity not adjusted for elevation in DHSVM 3.0?
cuol at u.washington.edu
cuol at u.washington.edu
Mon Jan 28 11:13:39 PST 2008
Hi Richard,
Erin said that you found a bug in ET calculation. Is the following email dealt with the problem?
Lan
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Richard Gwozdz wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> I've noticed that relative humidity does not appear to be adjusted for
> elevation in DHSVM 3.0. Instead, humidity is simply interpolated between
> stations. From MakeLocalMet.c:
>
> LocalMet.Rh += CurrentWeight * Stat[i].Data.Rh;
>
> If your catchment is large and topographical complex, I think this could
> introduce considerable bias in ET calculations.
>
> Liston and Elder (2006) dealt with this problem in their distributed
> meteorology model:
>
> Liston, G. E., and K. Elder. 2006. A meteorological distribution system for
> high-resolution terrestrial modeling (MicroMet). Journal of Hydrometeorology
> *7*:217-234.
>
> It requires making some assumption about the way dewpoint lapses, but I think
> it might be worth adding to the next version of DHSVM.
>
> Rich
>
> --
> Rich Gwozdz
> Fire and Mountain Ecology Lab
> College of Forest Resources University of Washington
> cell: 206-769-6808 office: 206-543-9138
> rgwozdz at u.washington.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dhsvm-users mailing list
> Dhsvm-users at u.washington.edu
> http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/dhsvm-users
>
More information about the Dhsvm-users
mailing list