[Dhsvm-users] Humidity not adjusted for elevation in DHSVM 3.0?

cuol at u.washington.edu cuol at u.washington.edu
Mon Jan 28 11:13:39 PST 2008



Hi Richard,

Erin said that you found a bug in ET calculation. Is the following email dealt with the problem?

Lan

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Richard Gwozdz wrote:


> Hello group,

>

> I've noticed that relative humidity does not appear to be adjusted for

> elevation in DHSVM 3.0. Instead, humidity is simply interpolated between

> stations. From MakeLocalMet.c:

>

> LocalMet.Rh += CurrentWeight * Stat[i].Data.Rh;

>

> If your catchment is large and topographical complex, I think this could

> introduce considerable bias in ET calculations.

>

> Liston and Elder (2006) dealt with this problem in their distributed

> meteorology model:

>

> Liston, G. E., and K. Elder. 2006. A meteorological distribution system for

> high-resolution terrestrial modeling (MicroMet). Journal of Hydrometeorology

> *7*:217-234.

>

> It requires making some assumption about the way dewpoint lapses, but I think

> it might be worth adding to the next version of DHSVM.

>

> Rich

>

> --

> Rich Gwozdz

> Fire and Mountain Ecology Lab

> College of Forest Resources University of Washington

> cell: 206-769-6808 office: 206-543-9138

> rgwozdz at u.washington.edu

>

> _______________________________________________

> Dhsvm-users mailing list

> Dhsvm-users at u.washington.edu

> http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/dhsvm-users

>





More information about the Dhsvm-users mailing list