[Imap-protocol] Optimistic incremental THREAD=REFERENCES
tss at iki.fi
Fri May 9 15:23:33 PDT 2008
On May 10, 2008, at 1:14 AM, Mark Crispin wrote:
> On Sat, 10 May 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> The subject-joining rule magnifies this. Personally I didn't
>>> imnplement the subject-joining bit.
>> Me neither. That generates more complexity and I'd rather drop the
>> subject merging completely (my X-REFERENCES2 threading algorithm
>> does that).
> Now, with that said, I do not object to the creation and
> publications of a new threading algorithm that is identical to
> REFERENCES but omits the subject consolidation step. I would
> probably implement it, especially if it really is identical modulo
> that step.
That's what I meant with my reply (but I guess I misunderstood Arnt's
reply about it). THREAD=REFERENCES works as standardized, but slower
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 201 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20080509/be038c2e/PGP.bin
More information about the Imap-protocol