[Imap-protocol] IMAP MOVE extension
dave at cridland.net
Fri Jun 11 05:21:17 PDT 2010
On Fri Jun 11 13:02:13 2010, John Snow wrote:
> Unfortunately, clients and users seem to prefer the trash-can
> model. In the trash model, the move command really
> is necessary. It's the only way to empty a mailbox that's full to
> quota. The copy to trash would fail but a move to
> trash will not.
If someone wants to design a sane extension suite that'll effectively
provide a "trash can" model server-side overlaid onto IMAP's existing
primitives, I'll be very interested.
Using the notion that client developers misuse the current
specifications as an argument to introduce new semantics doesn't
really sit well with me.
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at dave.cridland.net
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
More information about the Imap-protocol