[Imap-protocol] IMAP MOVE extension
tss at iki.fi
Fri Jun 11 07:44:39 PDT 2010
On pe, 2010-06-11 at 07:40 -0700, Dan Karp wrote:
> Incidentally, Mark's stated reason for avoiding a MOVE op in baseline
> IMAP was that it would be the only operation to require locking >1
> mailbox simultaneously. Or so I recall.
As long as there is no requirement for MOVE to be atomic (i.e. it would
be allowed to emulate it with copy+expunge), there's no need to lock
multiple mailboxes simultaneously.
More information about the Imap-protocol