MRC at CAC.Washington.EDU
Thu Sep 27 20:12:29 PDT 2007
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Joel Reicher wrote:
> Since IMAP is a NAS solution, you should think of implementing failover
> for an IMAP server the same way you would think of implementing it for
> an NFS server. Whatever measures you wouldn't bother with for an
> NFS server, don't bother with for an IMAP server, for all the same
I never thought of IMAP as a NAS before, but you're right that it is.
Thank you for a very clever analysis.
FWIW, UW gave up on SAN for IMAP due to cost.
-- Mark --
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
More information about the Imap-use