[Imap-uw] Simultaneous access to imap mailbox?

[John Kelly]

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:33:50 -0700 (PDT), Mark Crispin
<mrc at cac.washington.edu> wrote:

>IMAP is far LESS processor and memory intensive than it is I/O intensive. 
>That is, a single IMAP server system with adequate memory for the buffer 
>cache runs out of I/O bandwidth long before it runs out of processor.

Can you speculate on how mix compares to mbx, in terms of I/O load?
Seems like I remember you saying mix does not need atime.


-- 
Internet service
http://www.isp2dial.com/