Recommend MTA.

[Alexander Howard]

I would second postfix. It was designed with security in mind. Check
out the goals of the project at: http://www.postfix.org/goals.html

*-------------------------------------------------------------------*
|Alexander S. Howard, University Computing Services                 |
|Computing & Communications    Computing Specialist          	    |
|howardz at cac.washington.edu    (206) 685-9366                       |
|PGP Public Key: http://staff.washington.edu/howardz/pgpkey.txt	    |
|PGP Fingerprint: E5CB DEBE 0E31 937E C954  AA60 E4C8 E772 532E B34D|
*-------------------------------------------------------------------*

On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Evan Martin wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 09:41:57PM -0800, William Rowden wrote:
> > I need to configure an MTA for my (Red Hat 7.2) system, and this
> > list was helpful with Samba (thanks!), so I'm asking for
> > recommendations.  The default installation is running `sendmail`,
> > but I haven't found its configuration intuitive.  How do `qmail` and
> > `postfix`, for example, compare?  I see there are RPMs for those as
> > well.  What other MTAs are people using?  Is anyone using IMAP, POP3
> > or SMTP over SSL?
>
> Postfix is the one I always see recommended.  It works for me.
>
> I have, in my /etc/postfix/canonical:
> martine martine at cs.washington.edu
>
> --
>       Evan Martin
> martine at cs.washington.edu
>   http://neugierig.org
>
>