[linux] bacula users?
Matt Weatherford
mbw at u.washington.edu
Thu Feb 17 15:58:09 PST 2011
I used to get that error on my Dell 124T when I had put a tape in to the
empty slot that was reserved for the tape in the drive... backup
software independent problem... it was a "human putting the robot into
a deadlock state" problem....
On 2/17/2011 1:54 PM, Maria McKinley wrote:
> I have had problems similar to this occasionally, and have had some
> luck with releasing and remounting. Sometimes after releasing, I exit
> bacula and unload and load the tape changer using mtx. Then mounting
> again from bacula often works. I always thought these problems were
> just a matter of an old changer and some old tapes, but maybe
> something has changed in bacula's implementation of
> tape changer support.
>
> Sorry, don't have a great solution for this.
>
> cheers,
> maria
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Jeremiah D. Jester
> <jjest at u.washington.edu <mailto:jjest at u.washington.edu>> wrote:
>
> Hi Maria,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I continuously get errors stating that the storage device (Dell
> 124T) is “BLOCKED” despite having the tape mounted and set to
> ‘Recycle’ or ‘Append’.
>
> Here is a common message:
>
> 17-Feb 13:26 bacula02-sd JobId 1129: Please mount Volume
> "000109L4" or label a new one for:
>
> Job: red-offsite.2011-02-15_07.00.00_06
>
> Storage: "Drive1" (/dev/nst0)
>
> Pool: Offsite
>
> Media type: LTO4
>
> The volume appears to be available for writing…
>
> 5 | 000109L4 | Recycle | LTO4
> | Offsite |
>
> I mount the volume and get the following.
>
> *mount
>
> The defined Storage resources are:
>
> 1: File
>
> 2: Tape
>
> Select Storage resource (1-2): 2
>
> Enter autochanger slot: 5
>
> 3001 OK mount requested. Specified slot ignored. Device="Drive1"
> (/dev/nst0)
>
> Subsequent messages repeat me to mount the volume or label new
> one. I have plenty of tapes available in my scratch pool but is
> stuck on this one.
>
> These problem typically happen with new tapes. I have tried using
> ‘label barcodes’ for new tapes in the past but have gotten errors
> and resulted to rewinding the tape and writing ‘weof’ to the
> volume. Could these problems be related?
>
> Appreciate your input.
>
> Thanks
>
> -JJ
>
> Jeremiah Jester
> Informatics Specialist
>
> Microbiology – Katze Lab
>
> 206-732-6185
>
> *From:*linux-bounces at mailman2.u.washington.edu
> <mailto:linux-bounces at mailman2.u.washington.edu>
> [mailto:linux-bounces at mailman2.u.washington.edu
> <mailto:linux-bounces at mailman2.u.washington.edu>] *On Behalf Of
> *Maria McKinley
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 17, 2011 1:13 PM
> *To:* Linux/Unix Users Group at the UW
> *Subject:* Re: [linux] bacula users?
>
> Yup, what's going on?
>
> ~maria
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Jeremiah D. Jester
> <jjest at u.washington.edu <mailto:jjest at u.washington.edu>> wrote:
>
> Any Bacula users on this list? Having some issues that I would
> like to get a second opinion on.
>
> Thanks
> JJ
>
> Jeremiah Jester
> Informatics Specialist
>
> Microbiology – Katze Lab
>
> 206-732-6185
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Maria Mckinley
>
> Scientific Programmer
> Shadlen Lab
> Physiology and Biophysics
> Box 357290
> University of Washington
> (206) 616-3923
> parody at u.washington.edu <mailto:parody at u.washington.edu>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Maria Mckinley
> Scientific Programmer
> Shadlen Lab
> Physiology and Biophysics
> Box 357290
> University of Washington
> (206) 616-3923
> parody at u.washington.edu <mailto:parody at u.washington.edu>
>
>
More information about the Linux
mailing list