MOTHER-FRIENDLY CHILDBIRTH INITIATIVE (fwd)
Laura Larsson
larsson at u.washington.edu
Wed Oct 23 10:20:27 PDT 1996
Friends:
I'm forwarding this from a colleague of mine because one of the elements
is breastfeeding, of interest to some, if not all of you.
Regards,
Laura
larsson at u.washington.edu
listowner: PHNUTR-L at u.washington.edu
WebSpinner: Public Health Nutritionists Home Page:
http://weber.u.washington.edu/~larsson/phnutrit/nutrhome.html
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 11:54:17 -0500
From: Peg Allen <pallen at TCCCOM.NET>
Reply-To: Medical Libraries Discussion List <MEDLIB-L at UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list MEDLIB-L <MEDLIB-L at UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU>
Subject: MOTHER-FRIENDLY CHILDBIRTH INITIATIVE
As posted on the Nursing Research listserv; shared with permission:
THE MOTHER-FRIENDLY CHILDBIRTH INITIATIVE
NurseRes joins others in announcing the publication of
the Mother-Friendly Childbirth Initiative by The
Coalition for Improving Maternity Services (CIMS). The
paper culminates two years of cooperative efforts by a
coalition of 25 maternity care organizations and 27
prominent individuals.
The coalition includes professional associations of
midwives, maternity care nurses, childbirth educators,
providers of labor support and postpartum home support,
breastfeeding counselors, researchers, physicians,
authors, and consumer advocates. In the aggregate, the
coalition represents tens of thousands of maternity
care professionals.
The group came together to promote a wellness model of
maternity care that will improve birth outcomes for
mothers and babies while considerably reducing costs.
The coalition believes that improvement in maternity
care will come by basing care on the evidence of
world-wide medical research. This care would focus on
prevention and wellness, meet the psychological and
social needs of childbearing families, and stop the
routine use of high-cost, ineffective, and even harmful
testing and treatment.
Dr. Marsden Wagner, a perinatal epidemiologist and an
American consultant to the World Health Organization
commented: "Health is political. Genuine democracy is
served when coalitions such as this one promote change
in maternity services through initiatives which demand
that the public be fully informed. Once families are
fully informed they will truly have the freedom to
choose the maternity care best suited to their own
needs." The Mother-Friendly Childbirth Initiative
offers a design for moving from the present high-cost
form of maternity care where profits and fear of
lawsuits often drive decision making to a system of
partnership and cooperation between the pregnant woman
and her care givers.
The critical need for the consensus document is
expressed in its preamble. For example, the U.S.
spends far more money per capita on maternity and
newborn care than any other country. Yet, the U.S.
falls behind most industrialized countries in rates of
illness and death of newborns, and maternal death rates
are four times greater for African-American women than
for Euro-American women. The U.S. also has one of the
world's highest cesarean rates--more than one in five
women gives birth by major surgery--although research
shows that this rate could safely be halved. The
"Principles" section of the document lists the beliefs
the participants hold in common. These include that
birth can safely take place in hospitals, birth centers
or homes; that women should receive accurate and
up-to-date information about the benefits and risks of
all procedures, drugs, and tests and have the right to
give informed refusal; and that maternity care practice
should be based solely on the needs of mother and child
and not any other person or entity.
Dr. Wagner, a ratifier of the Initiative said, "Change
for the better in maternity care will come only when
the public understands the need to convert the present
doctor-friendly hospitals to mother-friendly hospitals.
The needs of the women must always come first."
CIMS plans in the near future to develop a means of
officially designating birth sites as Mother-Friendly.
Meanwhile, the Ten Steps of the Mother-Friendly
Childbirth Initiative provide a checklist that home
birth services, free-standing birth centers, and
hospitals can use to evaluate their quality of care.
In addition, pregnant women and professional or
consumer organizations can use the initiative to
compare the quality of services offered in their
communities. For example, step 6 requires that
mother-friendly birth sites have a total cesarean rate
of 10% or less in community hospitals and 15% in
high-risk hospitals and a vaginal birth after cesarean
rate of 60% or more.
For a copy of the Initiative that includes a list of
the organizations and individuals ratifying the
document visit the web site at either
http://www.healthy.net/cims or
http://www.lamaze_childbirth.com
and download a digital text copy of the document. The
Coalition for Improving Maternity Services, CIMS, has
given permission to reproduce the document with
attribution, and copying is encouraged. Visit the
MFCI Forum website "http://www.healthy.net/forums.htm"
for a discussion sponsored by Healthworld Online on the
Mother-Friendly Childbirth Initiative.
********************************************
Margaret (Peg) Allen, MLS-AHIP
Library/Information Consultant
Resource Librarian Consultant for Cinahl Information Systems
Library Consultant for Northern Wisconsin AHEC, Inc.
PO Box 2, 308 Kann, Stratford, WI 54484-0002
(715)687-4976 or (715)687-2287 Fax:(715)687-4976
pallen at tcccom.net
More information about the PHNUTR-L
mailing list