[pubcookie-users] shib sso v pubcookie sso

[John-Paul Robinson]

Oh, sorry.  I meant to add that.  

Basically, Pubcookie would remain supported with much the same feature set
it currently has and not be extended more than necessary.

This is my interpretation of his comments.  If I misunderstood his 
comments, it's not my intention to misrepresent the Pubcookie road map.

~jpr

On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Jim Fox wrote:

> 
> For those of us not there, was there a gist to Bob's slide?
> 
> Jim
> 
> > 
> > Well, had I simply waited a few minutes to send this email, I would have
> > gotten the answer from Bob's slide.  Sorry for the extra traffic. :)
> >
> > Thanks anyway and have a good one.
> >
> > ~jpr
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, John-Paul Robinson wrote:
> >
> >> but I'm also interested in getting a sense for where Pubcookie might go
> >> with the SAML 2.0/Shib2.0 tighter integration with the SSO service.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pubcookie-users mailing list
> > pubcookie-users at u.washington.edu
> > http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pubcookie-users
> >
>