[pubcookie-users] shib sso v pubcookie sso
jpr at uab.edu
Mon Jun 26 14:27:39 PDT 2006
Oh, sorry. I meant to add that.
Basically, Pubcookie would remain supported with much the same feature set
it currently has and not be extended more than necessary.
This is my interpretation of his comments. If I misunderstood his
comments, it's not my intention to misrepresent the Pubcookie road map.
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Jim Fox wrote:
> For those of us not there, was there a gist to Bob's slide?
> > Well, had I simply waited a few minutes to send this email, I would have
> > gotten the answer from Bob's slide. Sorry for the extra traffic. :)
> > Thanks anyway and have a good one.
> > ~jpr
> > On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, John-Paul Robinson wrote:
> >> but I'm also interested in getting a sense for where Pubcookie might go
> >> with the SAML 2.0/Shib2.0 tighter integration with the SSO service.
> > _______________________________________________
> > pubcookie-users mailing list
> > pubcookie-users at u.washington.edu
> > http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pubcookie-users
More information about the pubcookie-users